From:                                         Kevin D'Austin <kevin@kdadesigns.co.uk>

Sent:                                           08 May 2018 15:27

To:                                               Chakadya, Ralph

Cc:                                               aaron@rbslondon.co.uk

Subject:                                     RE: 180425HOU (133 and 135 Wykeham  Rd)

 

This is an EXTERNAL EMAIL. STOP. THINK before you CLICK links or OPEN attachments.

Hi

 

I confirm the extensions will be built together.

Regards

Kevin D’Austin


Architectural & Structural Services

21 Clifton Avenue
Stanmore
Middlesex
HA7 2HR

Home:   020 8909 9433
Mobile: 07739 427 023
Email:  kevin@kdadesigns.co.uk

 

 

 

From: Chakadya, Ralph [mailto:Ralph.Chakadya@reading.gov.uk]
Sent: 08 May 2018 12:07
To: 'Kevin D'Austin' <kevin@kdadesigns.co.uk>
Subject: 180425HOU (133 and 135 Wykeham Rd)

 

Dear Mr D’Austin

As you are aware, your application is for joint proposals  to adjoining properties 133 and 135 Wykeham Road. In isolation it is the view of Officers that each proposal would have the potential to have an adverse impact on the adjacent property. However, if both extensions were to be constructed at the same time, then it is likely that they would adequately mitigate the potential harm. As such, Officers would only be able to recommend the applications for approval if both applicants accept that each permission would be subject to a “Grampian” planning condition. The recommended condition would read as such:-

The extensions hereby permitted shall be constructed simultaneously  up to first floor roof level prior to the use of the extensions.  
Reason: To ensure that there is a reasonable prospect of both developments being completed in the interests of residential amenity.

In order to impose a Grampian condition, legal precedence sets out that Officers would need to be satisfied that there is a reasonable prospect that the “enabling” works being undertaken within the life-time of the permission (within 3 years of granting). As such, I would appreciate it if you could confirm whether your clients are agreeable to the imposition of the recommended condition and, if they are, that it is their intention to complete the extensions within the life-time of the planning permission, if it is forthcoming.

 

Ralph Chakadya 

Senior Planning Officer 

Reading Borough Council

Planning, Development and Regulatory Services

Bridge Street

Reading RG1 2LU

Telephone: 0118 937 2993

Mobile: 07855126057

Mobex: 86057

Fax: 0118 939 0435

Email: Ralph.chakadya@reading.gov.uk

 

This Council  implemented its Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) on 1st April 2015.  Planning applications which are decided on or after 1st April 2015 may be liable to pay the levy.  For more information please visit our website at http://beta.reading.gov.uk/readingldf

 

From the 1st April 2017 we will be charging for copies of decision notices, site history searches, conditions checks and s106 enquiries

http://www.reading.gov.uk/article/10488/Planning-Admin-Charges

 

 

Website | Facebook | Twitter | YouTube

 

cid:image003.jpg@01D04B85.75046420

 

 

 

 

The information in this e-mail is confidential to the intended recipient to whom it has been addressed and may be covered by legal professional privilege and protected by law. Reading Borough Council does not accept responsibility for any unauthorised amendment made to the contents of this e-mail following its dispatch.


If received in error, you must not retain the message or disclose its contents to anyone. Please contact the sender of the email or mailto: customer.services@reading.gov.uk, quoting the name of the sender and the addressee and then delete the e-mail.

Reading Borough Council has scanned for viruses. However, it is your responsibility to scan the e-mail and attachments (if any) for viruses.

Reading Borough Council also operates to the Protective Document Marking Standard as defined for the Public Sector. Recipients should ensure protectively marked emails and documents are handled in accordance with this standard (Re: Cabinet Office – Government Security Classifications).

 

 

 

Click here to report this email as spam.